The line up of teachers in Form 5B2 for the most important school examination of our lives - the 'O' level equivalent Malaysian Certificate of Examination (MCE) then - was:
Biology - Mrs. Leow/ Anandakrishnan ('young' Andy)
Chemistry - Mrs. Koh Swee Pheng
Physics - K. Durairajah
Maths/Additional Maths - Kok Lee Fatt/Cheok Cheo Foh/YW Cheang
Geography - Dharam Prakash
English Language - Mrs. Balaraman
English Literature - Mrs. Balaraman / Mrs. Yiap Khin Hin
Bahasa Malaysia - Cikgu Hassanudin/Puan Rohaty
Many would move on to Lower 6 and then Upper 6 for the Higher Scool Certificate (HSC) examinations. But Form 5 was THE crucial year for either going overseas (for the rich) for A-levels, moving on to Form 6 or entering the government or private sector work force. Without a MCE or equivalent qualification, the majority would struggle with employment in either the private or government sector. Of course these were the last few years when the curriculum was all English!!
Among that roll call of class teachers, Mrs. Yiap Khin Yin and Cheok Cheo Foh belonged to the "genius / brilliant" category. Mrs. Yiap not only brought Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' to life but opened up to us its relevance to contemporary life and death issues. If some 30 years later, I can still quote from Marc Antony's "Friends, Romans, countrymen..." funeral oration or Brutus' "There is a tide in the affairs of men, which taken at the flood leads on to fortune, Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and miseries...." then you know how good she was!!
There was also the hilarious 'The Card' by Arnold Bennet, written in 1911 and made into a movie in 1952 starring Sir Alec Guinness and Petula Clark, which told the story of Henry (Denry) Machin, a washerwoman's son who rose through sheer chuptzah and opportunism to become Mayor of Bursely, an imaginary town England. Mrs. Yiap's priming us for the final exam is the stuff of legends!!
As for Cheok, rare is the day when you could hope to get a fully awake class of 45 paying attention while the maths teacher droned on about dy/dx and the integral of the differential, the proof of why the angle on the diameter of a circle is always a right angle or the intial rules of probability theory - in some 30 years of working life I have never once had to resort to these formulae!! Yet, Cheok not only had us looking forward to each of his classes, he also managed the imposible in securing full attendance and voluntary handing up of homework on time from the entire class!! If that's not pure genius, I don't know what is!!
Cheok replaced Kok Lee Fatt who left us after 1st term. Kok wrung a silent vow out of me that I would move heaven and earth to get a distinction in MCE Maths. I had been missing classes due to hockey centralised training when one fine day Kok lectured to the whole class that those involved in centralised sports training - Indran, Balraj and myself - were destined to fail MCE Maths. Glad to report none of us did!!
After Cheok, there were brief stints from Yap Yew, R.Selvanathan and Cheang none of whom I recall as being in the same 'class' as Cheok.
Mrs. Koh at Chemistry and 'young' Andy were good but not inspiring. Of the stern-faced Biology teacher Mrs.Leow, I have already written earlier. Chemistry lab sessions were always fun, especially when you mixed hydrchloric acid with anything, performed titration tests or 'salts' identifying tests. The 'brown ring test' for nitrates in particular drew much pointed jokes while for no good reason one remembers the silver nitrate test for chlorides, the barium chloride test for sulphates and the famous 'cloudy solution' and litmus paper tests for carbon dioxide
In Anatomy, the study, identification and drawing of bones and vertebrae proved to be fascinating. My free hand drawings were shit, but I could easily tell the ulna from the radius and the thoracic vertebra from the lumbar and cervical types. All these were tested in the final lab exams which contributed some 30% of the overall MCE marks for Chemistry and Biology.
K.Durairajah or KD as we referred to him, stank all the way to the end of Form 6 in Physics and prevented many an Einstein from blossoming later in copyright offices!! KD who lectured in a low frequency squeaky voice was oblivious to whether the students understood the subject or passed, let alone, aced it. How we managed to get through without failing Physics is a major miracle of our times!!!
Saree clad and fair Mrs. Balaraman who also lectured the Form 6 seniors was a past mistress at droning on even if there were no students in front of her, such was the mechanical approach she brought to english language and literature. But nevertheless classmates like Tan Seng Tee found her sexy enough to pay attention and score 'A's!!
Dharam Prakash and Hassanudin (whenever he turned up) were adequate. Though BM was a compulsory subject most studied just enough to make sure we passed and got our full MCE cert. Puan Rohaty, like Mrs. Balaraman, had fine pectorals, dressed sexily and boasted many admirers in all the Forms. So we stampeded to clases and managed to get through subjects where otherwise we might have played truant. Where Dharam was meticulous and conscientious but boring, Hassanudin was sloppy and boring and just muddled through the syllabus.
Despite which most (98%) never bothered with private tuition lessons which seems di rigeur nowadays even in $15,000 - $50,000 per year private and international schools!!! The VI system of monthly and term tests and intense revision programmes towards the end of the year kept us well oiled and performance oriented!!
And of course, whether the teachers were brilliant or sucked at their subjects, they still worked a fine sweat out of everyone under their charge. What more could parents or studends demand of them?
As for sports and extra-curricular activities, 1970 was another high performance/achieving year for VI. In particular, the carmaraderie among the hockey and football players was oustanding about which I shall write in more detail later.
- to be continued.
dpp
ReplyDeleteMany thks for writing this article
and I dont know how you remember all these details
I also dont know how u got my email..??
but yr great.
I got into VI in 69 (4B2)and endured the rein of terror for one year
Now I wonder if I will recognise Nah Seang Hoo on the streets!!! How are you my friend!!!
ReplyDeleteGreat work dpp... and thanks for keeping me in the loop.
Actually I have been in and out of KL the whole month but mainly outstation. i am spending more and more time here than in Australia.
Be well ...
Dya (Daya)
--
Dya Singh
5 James Street
Noble Park, Victoria 3174
Australia Tel: +613 95478958
Exploring the Spirit Thru Music
Hi dpp,
ReplyDeleteGood stuff, many thanks for sharing.
On a personal note I was not exactly enamoured with Murugesu.
I thought he made us all feel small and useless, and was really no more than a bully who cared nought for the emotional damage he was wreaking in thousands of talented, promising and vulnerable individuals in their formative years. His behavior was morally reprehensible, and abominable to say the least.
Yes, many of us did well academically, but were there not stars emanating from RMC, St John’s and MBS KL?
Also, let us not forget that VI took the cream of the crop from Batu Road School and Pasar Road School to start with. And not all did well academically.
To this day I feel sick in my stomach whenever I think of my secondary school days under Murugesu, filled with fear and dread, and having to swallow the humiliation of his bullying ways.
Murugesu’s ethos was to run VI along military lines, and all that mattered was control and complete obedience, all for his own ego. Remember the way he used to strut on the pavilion steps casting his eye over the entire school assembled and practicing for the silly March Past? Even Olympic teams do not march the way we did.
Creativity, originality and confidence cannot blossom under tyranny, and this is the greatest disservice that Murugesu did to us all.
Take care,
Jaspal
................................................
Dear Jaspal
I'm not going to criticize you. You are entitled to your views based on your own experience and I can't ask anyone for more than their complete honesty.
I have no doubt too that there are elements of truth (without exaggeration) in what you say.
However, few are completely good or completely bad. And I believe Muru had the welfare of VI students and the school at heart, misguided as he may have been in the execution. Do remember too that era of HM's all came from similar backgrounds and were one of a kind/genre. The HM's (and many of the teachers too) in St.Johns, MBS KL and RMC were no less "terrors" who did not spare the rod!!
Keep writing in please. I value 'from the heart' honesty and opinions like yours more than any glib 'it was all great' sycophancy from anyone!
dpp
Hi dpp,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the invitation to keep writing...so, at the risk of irking those uncomfortable with visiting the past, here I go...
I wonder if it is the 'welfare of VI students and the school' that drove Muru, or was he not not just blinded by his ego? Or driven by an irrational, almost pathological need to prove to the world (read : the Ministry of Education) that being the first Asian HM, he could out- perform his white British predecessors? And therefore vindicate their decison to hand him the reins.
We must not forget that VI was already the Straits Settlements' premier secondary school at the time of his appointment, so it's not as if he had inherited a herd of buffalo (or seladangs) which he had to turn into thoroughbreds.
Muru's mistake I think was to believe that the way to prove himself was to make VI the Sparta of the schools. Hence his focus on militaristic discipline, taken to bizarre extremes as exemplified by the time and energy wasted in practising for the March Past, a show put on for KL's idle Establishment with nothing better to do on a Saturday afternoon.
Power corrupts, especially power over the weak, the vulnerable and the defenceless, which is what happened to Muru. Far from nurturing the promising young boys entrusted to his care to blossom into confident future leaders of Government and Commerce, he hammered them all into a state of abject submission, using fear of corporate punishmnet as his preferred instrument. A Hannibal Lector in his day.
In the years I experienced his rule, I do not recall anything he did or say that inspired me, nor do I recall him ever referring to the achievements of his predecessors. Maybe it was because my mind had gotten conditioned to go into a automatic state of paralysis in his presence, seized by fear that perhaps the knot of my tie was not quite right, or my turban not of a colour to his liking.
No, Muru's was a reign of terror, with Muru himself no less than a Rasputin on steroids. So I find it hard to believe that students were saddened to see him leave. I myself was delirious with joy.
It would be great to hear the honest views of others.
Hi Jasp:
ReplyDelete"...taken to bizarre extremes as exemplified by the time and energy wasted in practising for the March Past, a show put on for KL's idle Establishment with nothing better to do on a Saturday afternoon."
I think the March Past practice, and the efforts to put on a good show in front of parents and public on Sports Day can't be faulted. The Cadet Corp and Band guys put in a hell of a lot more time and effort to produce an excellent show. Just ask guys like Poh Woh and Rama.
What I think most would complain about is the scolding, slapping and indiscriminate caning and slapping. You are right that many feared going to school and being caned by Muru or the teachers for the most harmless of infringement of school rules - forgetting to wear the school badge, polishing shoes etc. Darwis has written about his trepidations before.
Me, I was too busy with the books and sports to get in the way of Muru, though I did get cuffed by the likes of Manuel and Rajaratnam, and received a couple of strokes hear and there from the chief perpertrator of the "reign of terro"!! But it has not scarred me; but then I can't speak for others.
AS for stifling innovation and creativity, I don't know. I mean you and I and others like Rama, TA Mohan, Fong, Mike Nettleton, Shubon, Beng Yew, Kong Voon, Jalil, Hamid, Cheah, Sarmukh, Balraj, Indran, Chin Seong, Theam Siew, Mac, Pat, Kai Chah, Alex Eow and the F5 gang of 1970 and F6 1972 have all done ok, haven't we? Or is it, despite all the walloping?
But then I have this arguement that we should judge Mahathir not by what he achieved, but by what MORE COULD have been achieved had he clamped down on corruption and promoted more meritocracy and open competition!!
Hope to hear from all you guys out there. Don't worry. It's been 40 years and no one's gonna sue you!! It's only with a little bit of introspection and delving into the past are we going to be better parents and leaders!
dpp
Hi, it was baffling as to why i was not able to get to your blogsite after so long, perhaps it was becos there was too much to read from MT and sopo and all the links. Extremely glad that there is dpp posting nostalgic stuff of the great VI. I was in 5A1, a quiet chap, from a poor family struggling to get thru the exams. Have left the country since 2002 and now residing in Ozland. Read in one of your posting that 1966 was a great year for VI as there was a good intake of great students from Pres1 and 2 and Batu Road school. I disagree, cos i was the stupid one. Flung my Malay paper and flung my MCE. Thanks to the Govt, for we were the first batch to have to pass Bahasa. Compulsory, the word we say those days. Thanks for writing, certainly enjoy reading all this.
ReplyDeleteHi Ivan
ReplyDeleteGreat to hear from you. Perhaps you can share 1 or 2 of your experiences in VI from 1966-1970?
And could we have your full name for the record?
Best regards
dpp